New Jersey asks Supreme Court to resolve fight over Kalshi's future
New Jersey has petitioned the US Supreme Court to resolve a jurisdictional conflict regarding the regulation of prediction markets like Kalshi. The case centers on whether federal commodity regulators or state gambling authorities hold the primary power to oversee these platforms.
Why it matters
The outcome will set a legal precedent for the regulation of emerging financial technologies and the balance of power between state and federal authorities in the gambling sector.
The multibillion dollar battle over the future of prediction markets has reached the Supreme Court.
New Jersey on Wednesday asked the high court to weigh in on a legal battle that has pitted dozens of states against the prediction market sector, which is strongly backed by the Trump administration.
Technology Kalshi says it's not a sportsbook even as World Cup bets surge At issue is who exactly should regulate sports betting on the prediction market platform Kalshi: federal commodities regulators, as the company insists, or state gambling authorities?
While prediction market sites like Kalshi offer wagering on everything from what an executive says on an earnings call to the outcome of an election , sports bets are the most popular by far, typically representing 80% or more of the platforms' weekly trading volume.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in