National security can’t come at expense of social security, Burnham tells PMQs
Andy Burnham has challenged the UK government, arguing that national security spending should not come at the cost of social security. The debate highlights a political vulnerability for the Labour party as they balance defense spending targets with welfare commitments.
Why it matters
It reflects the ongoing tension between military funding requirements and domestic social welfare priorities in UK politics.
Defence spending has created vulnerability for Burnham published at 14:12 BST 9 September 14:12 BST 9 September Harry Farley Reporting from the House of Commons
I’ve just come from the regular briefing the prime minister’s team does with reporters after PMQs. It’s our opportunity to press for further details, or ask for clarifications, on what was said in the Commons.
The immediate focus was on Andy Burnham’s line that supporting national security "can't come at the expense of social security”.
His press team were at pains to stress his previous commitment that "national security is the most important duty of any government”.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in