National security can't come at expense of social security, Burnham says
UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham has defended his government's approach to balancing national security and social welfare spending during Prime Minister's Questions. While the Conservatives criticized the delay in meeting specific defense spending targets, Burnham emphasized a holistic approach to funding security through social investment.
Why it matters
The debate highlights the ongoing political tension in the UK regarding fiscal priorities and the trade-off between military readiness and domestic social programs.
Image source, House of Commons By Becky Morton , Political reporter and Harry Farley , Political correspondent Published 9 September 2026, 13:30 BST Updated 1 hour ago Andy Burnham has said national security "can't come at the expense of social security", as he was challenged over funding for defence at Prime Minister's Questions.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch pressed Burnham over whether he would spend 3% of GDP on defence by 2030 and how he would pay for this.
The PM said the government's commitment to defence was "absolute" and he would set a target date to reach the 3% figure in the spring.
Burnham said he would fund defence and get the welfare bill down in "the Labour way", by changing education, supporting young people and providing more mental health support.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in