Natembeya protests alleged security withdrawal

Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya has demanded a formal explanation from the Inspector-General of the National Police Service regarding the second withdrawal of his security detail. He argues that the move violates constitutional protections and legal procedures governing the security of public officials.
Why it matters
This highlights ongoing tensions between executive authorities and regional leadership in Kenya regarding the rule of law and the politicization of state security services.
Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya. Photo/Handout Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya has raised concern over the alleged withdrawal of his security, demanding a formal explanation from the Inspector-General of the National Police Service.
Natembeya said the withdrawal had occurred for the second time, raising questions over whether the authorities had followed the constitutional and legal procedures governing changes to the security assigned to public officials.
In a statement on Thursday, the governor said public power must be exercised within the Constitution and the rule of law, arguing that any decision affecting his security should be lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.
He cited Article 47 of the Constitution, which guarantees every person the right to administrative action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair, including written reasons where a decision adversely affects a right or fundamental freedom.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in