Most IVF ‘add-on’ treatments have no effect on fertility or remain unproven, study says
A comprehensive review published in The Lancet indicates that most IVF 'add-on' treatments lack reliable evidence of effectiveness and may be a waste of money. The study highlights that over 70% of patients in several countries pay for these unproven procedures, which can cause financial strain and false hope.
Why it matters
It exposes the commercialization of fertility treatments and the lack of clinical evidence supporting expensive, non-standard medical interventions.
More than 70% of IVF patients in the UK, Australia and New Zealand pay for one or more add-on during IVF treatment. Photograph: Antonio Marquez lanza/Getty Images View image in fullscreen More than 70% of IVF patients in the UK, Australia and New Zealand pay for one or more add-on during IVF treatment. Photograph: Antonio Marquez lanza/Getty Images IVF Most IVF ‘add-on’ treatments have no effect on fertility or remain unproven, study says Review shows majority of procedures offered alongside standard IVF not backed by reliable evidence
The article reports on scientific findings and peer-reviewed research without taking a political stance.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in