Man faces Rs 17.18 lakh tax penalty over Rs 55.62 lakh unexplained deposits; ITAT gives relief
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of a taxpayer, stating that tax authorities cannot impose penalties under a different section than the one cited in the initial assessment order. The case involved a dispute over unexplained cash deposits totaling Rs 55.62 lakh.
Why it matters
This ruling clarifies procedural requirements for tax authorities, ensuring that taxpayers are protected from arbitrary or misapplied penalty assessments.
Unexplained cash can lead to a notice from the Income Tax Department, and sometimes even a penalty. But what happens if the penalty is imposed under the wrong section?In one such case, the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that a tax officer cannot impose a penalty under one provision of the Income Tax Act when the assessment order records that proceedings were being initiated under different provisions.What the case is aboutA man had not filed an income tax return for assessment year 2016-17. The tax department subsequently completed a reassessment without his participation and, on February 15, 2024, assessed his total income at Rs 55.62 lakh.The amount was treated as unexplained cash deposits in a bank account that the department attributed to him.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in