The Hindu·3 min read·medium

Madras High Court dismisses plea to prevent resigned MLAs from recontesting in the resulting bypolls

Madras High Court dismisses plea to prevent resigned MLAs from recontesting in the resulting bypolls
AI Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed a petition seeking to prevent resigned MLAs from recontesting in bypolls, stating that such regulations must be enacted by Parliament. The court emphasized that it cannot impose a cooling-off period or financial penalties on legislators without statutory authority.

Why it matters

The decision clarifies the separation of powers regarding electoral reform and the limitations of judicial intervention in political processes.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

The Madras High Court on Thursday (September 24, 2026) dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) petition, which sought to restrain the conduct of byelections to the Madurantakam and Dharapuram Assembly constituencies in Tamil Nadu until the disposal of the main plea to prevent the practice of MLAs resigning their post only to seek re-election from the same constituencies after joining other political parties.

The First Division Bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan rejected the PIL plea filed by Chennai-based advocate K. Suthan. It held that the court could not issue a direction to the Election Commission of India (ECI) to either prescribe a cooling-off period of five years before permitting the resigned MLAs to recontest in elections or insist upon them to bear the entire bypoll expenses.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicseducation

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in