LSK holds firm on judges' boycott amid access to justice concerns
The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) is maintaining its boycott of specific judges, arguing that the Judicial Service Commission has failed to address concerns regarding judicial integrity and corruption. LSK President Charles Kanjama stated the action is necessary to protect the long-term interests of the justice system.
Why it matters
The standoff between the legal profession and the judiciary impacts the public's access to justice and the perceived independence of the courts.
The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) has defended its boycott of selected judges and judicial officers, saying the action will remain in force until the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) addresses their concerns. Speaking in Nairobi on Friday, July 31, LSK President Charles Kanjama acknowledged concerns that the boycott could affect litigants' constitutional right to access justice. However, he said the action is intended to protect the long-term interests of litigants, lawyers, judges and the justice system. According to the lawyer, the targeted boycott is lawful and a principled effort aimed at safeguarding judicial integrity and upholding the rule of law. "LSK is undertaking these actions not at the behest of any particular party, but because we have listened to the cry of Kenyans and of our members, the lawyers, who have witnessed a continuous deterioration in some services within the Judiciary," said Kanjama.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in