LPM accuses Swapo of sidelining parliamentary scrutiny

The Landless People’s Movement (LPM) in Namibia has accused the ruling Swapo party of undermining parliamentary oversight. The opposition claims Swapo uses its majority to shield the executive from accountability and delay critical national discussions.
Why it matters
This highlights ongoing tensions regarding democratic governance and the balance of power within the Namibian legislative system.
The Landless People’s Movement (LPM) has accused Swapo of using its parliamentary majority, allegedly in cooperation with the speaker, to frustrate opposition scrutiny and shield the executive from accountability.
LPM chief whip Dawid Eigub in a statement released on Wednesday says a growing pattern of ministers failing to appear for difficult questions, providing inadequate answers and using parliamentary time on “flimsy” questions is undermining effective oversight.
He says Swapo parliamentarians are allegedly posing predictable questions to their own ministers, followed by lengthy prepared responses, reducing time available for opposition members to raise issues affecting Namibians.
Eigub says matters including rent control, land delivery, the land bill, public enterprise governance, petroleum legislation, employment and housing risked being delayed or pushed down the parliamentary agenda.
He also raises concern over alleged political pressure on majority members of parliament through threats, coercion and forced open voting on matters of national interest.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in