Article may be outdated

This article is 71 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Hindu·5 min read·hard

Lists of folly: On the Supreme Court, the SIR and benefits

Lists of folly: On the Supreme Court, the SIR and benefits
✦AI Summary

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that exclusion from electoral rolls cannot be used as a basis to deny citizens welfare benefits. The court criticized the West Bengal government for linking voter registration status to access to food and cash transfer schemes.

Why it matters

This ruling protects the fundamental rights of citizens to receive government support regardless of their status on electoral rolls.

✦Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

The Supreme Court has reiterated its position that exclusion from the electoral rolls cannot have consequences unrelated to voting . The Court was responding to West Bengal government orders, issued in May-June, that linked welfare benefits and official caste certifications to the outcomes of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls . Those removed would become ineligible for certain welfare benefits and certifications under these orders. A May 19 notification directed that persons removed from the electoral roll should not continue as beneficiaries of the Annapurna Yojana, a cash transfer scheme for women, unless they had filed appeals before the SIR tribunal. A June 4 order directed the deletion of beneficiaries from the Public Distribution System. On May 14, the government decided to re-verify and cancel caste certificates of those persons whose names had been deleted from the rolls.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicssocial justice
✦

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in