Lindsay Clancy trial ends in mistrial over deaths of three children
A judge declared a mistrial in the case of Lindsay Clancy, who is accused of killing her three children, after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict. Most jurors favored a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity due to postpartum psychosis, but one holdout prevented a final decision.
Why it matters
The case has sparked a significant national conversation regarding maternal mental health and the legal system's handling of postpartum psychosis.
A judge declared a mistrial Friday (September 4, 2026) after a jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the high-profile case of an American woman who killed her three young children.
Lindsay Clancy, 36, acknowledged strangling Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months, but claimed she should be excused from criminal responsibility because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.
After seven days of deliberations, the jury of nine women and three men was unable to reach a unanimous decision, as required in criminal proceedings in the United States.
11 jurors were in favor of finding Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity, but they were opposed by a single holdout.
“At this point, I’m going to declare that the jury is deadlocked, and I’m going to declare a mistrial,” Judge William Sullivan said.
Prosecutors must now decide whether to try the case again before a new jury.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in