Lindsay Clancy's motion for a finding of not guilty denied weeks after mistrial - Fox News
A Massachusetts judge denied Lindsay Clancy's motion for a not guilty verdict following a mistrial in her murder case. The court ruled that there was sufficient evidence for a jury to determine criminal responsibility despite arguments regarding her mental health.
Why it matters
The case raises significant legal and ethical questions regarding the intersection of severe mental illness and criminal culpability in capital cases.
Massachusetts Judge William Sullivan has denied Lindsay Clancy's motion for a required finding of not guilty. Sullivan had denied a similar motion when her mistrial was declared on Sept. 4, and denied a renewed attempt Thursday after defense attorney Kevin Reddington argued earlier this week that Plymouth County prosecutors had failed to introduce enough evidence at trial to prove his client guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. "There was evidence introduced, both physical and circumstantial, that would permit a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of the charge of murder," Sullivan wrote. LINDSAY CLANCY LAWYER RAISES EXPLOSIVE DOUBT OVER WHO KILLED HER CHILDREN FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X He also disagreed with Reddington's argument that the state had failed to prove Clancy could have been criminally responsible for the murders.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in