Lindsay Clancy's lawyer now questions whether she killed her 3 children
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington is challenging the evidence in the Lindsay Clancy case, arguing there is insufficient proof she killed her three children. This follows a deadlocked jury trial that previously focused on her mental state.
Why it matters
The case raises complex legal and ethical questions regarding mental health defenses and the burden of proof in high-profile criminal trials.
Lindsay Clancy's lawyer argued Tuesday that there wasn't enough evidence to prove she killed her three children, a striking turn after a lengthy trial that focused more on her mental state than on whether she took their lives.
"This entire case is based on speculation," attorney Kevin Reddington said during the first hearing since Clancy's trial ended Sept. 4 with a deadlocked jury. They were split 11 to 1 in her favor.
During that trial, Reddington didn't dispute that Clancy killed the children at the family's home in 2023. Instead, the defense sought to persuade the jury that the 36-year-old former labor and delivery nurse was not criminally responsible because of mental disease, a rare condition called postpartum psychosis. ___
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in