Lindsay Clancy jury member 'had reasonable doubt' but would not acquit, foreperson says
A mistrial was declared in the Lindsay Clancy murder case after a jury could not reach a unanimous verdict. While eleven jurors favored a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity, one juror refused to agree, leading to the deadlock.
Why it matters
The case highlights the complexities of legal defenses involving mental health and the high threshold for consensus required in the US judicial system.
Lindsay Clancy looks on as Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial, September 4, 2026. ( Reuters: Greg Derr/Pool )
Three members of the Lindsay Clancy jury have detailed how the group could not reach a consensus, leading to a mistrial.
Eleven members of the jury were persuaded to find her not guilty by reason of insanity, but one member would not acquit.
Although the trial ended without a verdict, prosecutors are free to start a new trial with a new jury.
Link copied Share Share article Three members of the Lindsay Clancy jury have spoken about failing to reach a consensus in an interview with US media.
Warning: This story contains details of a crime that may be distressing for some readers.
Also covering this story
2 other newsrooms covered this event. We read each version separately.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in