Letters: Super assumptions; drug testing; ‘sly’ semantics
A letter to the editor argues that the current New Zealand Superannuation rates are insufficient for couples, citing outdated assumptions about shared living costs. The author calls for a re-evaluation of financial support for seniors to ensure basic dignity and living standards.
Why it matters
Reflects growing public concern regarding cost-of-living crises and the adequacy of social safety nets for aging populations.
Reminder, this is a Premium article and requires a subscription to read.
Add up the cost of two coffees, a meal, petrol and rent "and the arithmetic becomes brutal" for a couple on super, Hamilton Grey Power chairman Rudi du Plooy writes. Photo / 123rf
“What older Kiwis want from politicians this election ” (October 4) rightly highlighted the cost of living, healthcare and the future of superannuation. Yet one fundamental unfairness received little attention.
A couple on NZ Super currently receive about $854 a week after tax. Two coffees cost them 1.4% of that weekly income. A simple $55 meal is 6.4%. Filling the car ($60) is another 7%. Add a modest rent of $500 a week – already more than half their Super – plus power, insurance, food and medical costs, and the arithmetic becomes brutal.
The system still assumes “two can live as cheaply as one”.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in