LCS ‘better than nothing’ despite prolonged delays, say experts
Defense analysts argue that Malaysia's littoral combat ship (LCS) project remains a necessary asset for the navy despite significant cost overruns and delivery delays. Experts suggest that while the technology may be dated upon arrival, the ships are still better than having no naval capability.
Why it matters
The project represents a major national defense procurement issue, highlighting concerns over government spending, project management, and military readiness.
A cross-service, cross-ministry procurement committee overseeing defence asset purchases would ensure decisions are not left in the hands of a single individual, says an expert. (Bernama pic)
PETALING JAYA: The controversial littoral combat ship (LCS) project will still provide the navy with important and relevant assets despite repeated delays in the ships’ handover, say defence analysts.
While some quarters have suggested that the ships may be outdated by the time of delivery, defence analysts Lam Choong Wah and Salawati Mat Basir maintained that the LCS would still significantly enhance the Malaysian navy’s capabilities.
Lam Choong Wah.
Lam, of Universiti Malaya, acknowledged that the ships’ management systems, situational awareness tools and weapons platforms may be lagging technologically by the time operations commence.
“However, by definition, this is not a ‘white elephant’ project that delivers nothing,” he said, adding that the LCS would still enhance our navy's capability significantly.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in