Lawyers fighting N.Y. AG’s role in Cornell assault investigation say she isn’t ‘viable’ as prosecutor

Lawyers for a former Cornell fraternity member are seeking to remove New York Attorney General Letitia James from a sexual assault case. They argue that her public social media comments demonstrate a bias and presumption of guilt against the defendants.
Why it matters
This case highlights the tension between public officials' roles as advocates for victims and their duties to maintain impartiality in legal proceedings.
MONTICELLO, N.Y. — Lawyers for one of seven former Cornell University fraternity members accused in a high-profile sexual assault lawsuit argued in court Thursday that New York Attorney General Letitia James should be removed as special prosecutor, alleging she is biased against the defendants. Gillio Lopes filed a petition this month seeking to block James’ appointment to oversee the case. The petition argues that James has “unequivocally demonstrated a bias and presumption of guilt against the defendants.” Lopes has denied sexually assaulting the plaintiff, who has been identified in court documents by the pseudonym Jane Doe. Sullivan County Supreme Court Judge James R. Farrell did not immediately rule on Lopes’ lawyers’ request. Lopes’ attorneys have cited a social media post James published three days before she was appointed special prosecutor. “What this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable,” James wrote on X on Sept.
Also covering this story
One other newsroom covered this event. We read that version too.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in