Kunal Kamra moves Supreme Court on issue concerning legislative privileges
Stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra has petitioned the Supreme Court to intervene in a case regarding legislative privileges and freedom of speech. The case examines whether lawmakers can use privilege proceedings to stifle public criticism.
Why it matters
This case addresses the critical tension between legislative immunity and the fundamental right to free speech in a democratic society.
Stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra has moved the Supreme Court, seeking to intervene in a case on the interpretation of provisions related to the scope of legislative privileges of MLAs and its effect on the freedom of speech and expression.
A seven-judge Constitution bench would commence hearing on October 6 on the interpretation of provisions related to the scope of legislative privileges of MLAs and its effect on the freedom of speech and expression.
In his plea, the comedian submitted that he is directly affected by the questions of law before the top court because of the privilege proceedings pending against him in the Maharashtra State Assembly over his stand-up comedy special "Naya Bharat." Mr. Kamra submitted that the exercise of legislative privilege "to stifle" the speech of citizens strikes at the heart of democracy.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in