Kernel Anti-Cheat Is an Overreach
The author argues that kernel-level anti-cheat software in video games represents a significant security overreach, granting deep system access to potentially untrustworthy entities. The piece raises concerns about privacy, data sovereignty, and the potential for state-sponsored surveillance.
Why it matters
It addresses the trade-off between digital security and the intrusive measures taken by software companies to combat cheating in gaming.
I want to preface this with the fact that I’m not a gamer. I’m game-curious, but I often lack the time to really devote. But a close friend of mine games pretty frequently and he brought me (a bit) up to speed recently. I hobbled together a computer from various parts (and then overpaid for a GPU), I got excited about spending some liesure time playing. But during the process I realized that in order to play many of the biggest games, you are forced to install a closed-source driver and provide root access to your operating system. So I decided to do some research and found that the owners of this anti-cheating software include a Chinese firm on a US defense list, a Saudi sovereign wealth fund, and a private-equity chain.
The article takes a critical stance on corporate power and government surveillance, reflecting a privacy-first perspective.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in