Article may be outdated

This article is 11 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Eastleigh Voice·3 min read·medium

Justice Edward Muriithi steps aside from rice import case despite rejecting government bias claims

C
Carolyne Kubwa
Justice Edward Muriithi steps aside from rice import case despite rejecting government bias claims
AI Summary

Justice Edward Muriithi has recused himself from a high-profile case involving the government's duty-free rice import plan. Although he denied claims of bias, he stepped down to preserve the integrity of the court following accusations from the Attorney-General.

Why it matters

The case involves significant government policy regarding food security and agricultural pricing, and the recusal highlights tensions between the judiciary and the executive branch.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Justice Edward Muriithi has recused himself from a case challenging the government’s plan to import 490,000 tonnes of rice duty-free, saying he wanted to protect the integrity of the proceedings from allegations of bias. The Kerugoya High Court judge rejected claims by the Attorney-General that he had favoured Kirinyaga Senator Kamau Murango, who filed the petition against the imports. Justice Muriithi found no evidence of actual bias, personal interest or conflict of interest but said it was in the interests of justice for another judge to hear the dispute. “This court takes no personal interest or property in any matter before it, and it must, in the interest of securing the process of the court from any allegations of bias, allow the hearing of the dispute by another court,” he said.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicsworldfood

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in