Article may be outdated

This article is 60 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Business Insider·3 min read·medium

Justice Department opens civil rights probe after NYC coffee shop bans congressman over Israel support

Justice Department opens civil rights probe after NYC coffee shop bans congressman over Israel support
AI Summary

The U.S. Department of Justice has launched a civil rights investigation into a New York City coffee shop chain that banned Congressman Daniel Goldman. The business cited Goldman's support for Israel and his ties to AIPAC as reasons for the refusal of service.

Why it matters

This case highlights the growing intersection of political activism, private business service policies, and federal civil rights protections regarding political affiliation and discrimination.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Rep. Daniel Goldman, who is facing a heated primary challenge, received an endorsement and more than $190,000 in donations from AIPAC for the 2026 cycle. Spencer Platt/Getty Images Poetica Coffee is facing a civil rights probe after banning a pro-Israel congressman from its cafés. The chain posted that they'd barred Rep. Daniel Goldman from stores, citing his ties to AIPAC. The Justice Department opened an investigation, calling the action "reprehensible." The Justice Department said Monday that it's investigating a chain of New York City coffee shops for banning a congressman over his support for Israel. In a Sunday post on Facebook, Poetica Coffee wrote that it had refunded and barred Democratic Rep. Daniel Goldman, from New York's 10th District, saying he was not "ever" welcome at its stores in Brooklyn and the East Village. "Hey Congressman Dan Goldman, we see that you stopped by our shop today for a coffee," read the post, which was accompanied by a photo of Goldman at the counter. "Do you see how it doesn't taste like genocide juice? Or are you still having a hard time telling the difference?" It continued: "See, here at Poetica, we don't serve racists, fascists, homophobes, genocide enablers, or anyone in between. Too bad we didn't recognize you right away, or we would have turned you away. We issued you a refund—we don't need your money (it's probably coming from AIPAC anyways)." Screenshots posted online showed that Goldman responded, saying he was sorry to see Poetica's post and that he bought a coffee from the business after a barista allowed his 7-year-old daughter to use the restroom, even though they had not purchased anything prior. "I made sure to buy a coffee in return for her kindness. I hope you at least make sure she gets the tip that she deserved," Goldman wrote. According to federal data, Goldman, who is facing a primary challenge from former city Comptroller Brad Lander, received an endorsement and more than $190,000 in direct and earmarked donations from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee for the 2026 cycle. Facing mounting pressure from Lander, Goldman publicly disavowed the donations and pledged to return the funds, Politico reported. By Monday evening, the coffee shop's founder, Parviz Mukhamadkulov, had become the subject of a pile-on of negative reviews and a federal probe , with Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, writing in an X post that the division was aware of the incident. "Federal law prohibits public accommodations such as coffee shops from discriminating against patrons based on their race, religion, or national origin," Dhillon wrote. "These actions are not only reprehensible, they're potentially illegal. The Civil Rights Division has opened an investigation, and will bring an enforcement action if warranted." Representatives for Poetica Coffee, the Justice Department, and Goldman did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Business Insider. Read the original article on Business Insider

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicssocial justicebusiness
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 80%

The article reports on the actions of both the business and the DOJ without taking a stance on the legitimacy of the ban or the investigation.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in