Judicial integrity — a case the Court cannot ignore
Supreme Court Judge Justice Sandeep Mehta has written letters to the Chief Justice of India alleging misconduct, nepotism, and maladministration by Acting Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court, Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma. The allegations include the misuse of power regarding case assignments and the intimidation of fellow judges.
Why it matters
The controversy raises significant questions about judicial integrity, the transparency of the collegium system, and the governance of High Courts.
Serious allegations against the Acting Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court, Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, have come to light following reports of letters written by Supreme Court of India judge Justice Sandeep Mehta to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), in which he has sought Justice Sharma’s immediate transfer. Justice Mehta, who previously served as a judge of the Rajasthan High Court and is regarded for his uprightness, discipline, and integrity, wrote three such letters on August 2, 10, and 17. The contents of these letters are now partly in the public domain.
COMMENT | End the culture of secrecy in judicial appointments
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in