'Judges appoint judges' is a myth: SC split over CEC appointment law
The Supreme Court of India is currently deliberating on the constitutional validity of the law governing the appointment of Election Commissioners. A split verdict has emerged regarding whether the case should be referred to a larger Constitution Bench, highlighting debates over the inclusion of the Chief Justice of India in the selection process.
Why it matters
The independence of the Election Commission is a cornerstone of Indian democracy, making the appointment process a matter of significant public and legal interest.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday delivered a split verdict on whether the challenge to the law governing the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners should be considered by a Constitution Bench.Under the law, the selection panel comprises the Prime Minister, a Union cabinet minister and the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha.Justice Dipankar Datta countered the Centre's argument against the collegium system for appointing judges, saying the perception that "judges appoint judges" is a myth.Justice Datta also said that there was no need to refer the case to the constitution bench and a two-judge bench can examine its validity.READ ALSO: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/differing-views-normal-part-of-deliberation-ec-responds-after-report-flags-rift-over-sir/articleshow/134429923.cmsLast month, underscoring the need for an independent and impartial process for selection of the chief election commissioner and election commissioners, Supreme Court said Election Commission must not only act independently but must also be seen to act independently.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in