Judge dismisses Chegg and Penske antitrust lawsuits targeting Google AI search
A US federal judge has dismissed antitrust lawsuits filed by Chegg and Penske Media against Google regarding AI search features. The court ruled that Google's scraping of content for AI overviews does not constitute an antitrust violation, as publishers have no legal right to guaranteed search traffic.
Why it matters
This ruling sets a significant legal precedent for how AI companies can utilize web content, potentially limiting the ability of publishers to seek damages for lost traffic caused by AI-generated search results.
Expectation (≠) Agreement Judge dismisses Chegg and Penske antitrust lawsuits targeting Google AI search The court acknowledges AI search comes with consequences, but it’s not an antitrust issue.
2 Credit: Ryan Whitwam Credit: Ryan Whitwam Text settings Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only Learn more Minimize to nav In a setback for publishers worried about the effects of AI search, a US federal judge has dismissed lawsuits filed by Chegg and Penske Media against Google. The companies accused Google of antitrust violations in products like AI overviews, which have led to decreasing traffic at numerous sites. However, US District Judge Amit Mehta has ruled that Google’s conduct is not illegal under antitrust law.
Also covering this story
One other newsroom covered this event. We read that version too.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in