IVF add-ons: Research finds expensive invasive fertility clinic extras don’t always help with pregnancy

A new systematic review published in The Lancet suggests that many expensive 'add-on' treatments offered by fertility clinics lack scientific evidence for improving IVF success rates. Researchers warn that vulnerable patients may be opting for these invasive procedures due to the emotional desperation associated with infertility.
Why it matters
This research challenges standard industry practices and highlights the financial and emotional burden placed on couples seeking fertility assistance.
Infertility now affects one in six Australian couples, leading more people to turn to IVF to have a baby. Australia has one of the highest rates of IVF uptake per capita in the world, with more than 100,000 cycles performed a year. That’s almost doubled since 2010 and now one in 16 babies born in Australia is conceived through IVF. But IVF success rates are relatively modest at an average 30 to 40 per cent per cycle, and out-of-pocket costs can run into thousands of dollars. There are various optional treatments, or add-ons, offered by fertility clinics or available in the community, that are aimed to boost the chance of success of IVF. But new Australian research has found there is little or no evidence that many of these add-ons – some of which are invasive and expensive – help women get pregnant or have a baby.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in