Article may be outdated

This article is 45 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Atlantic·5 min read·medium

Is This the End of AI Shame?

W
Will Oremus
Is This the End of AI Shame?
✦AI Summary

The Wall Street Journal is defending the use of AI in op-eds after investor Stanley Druckenmiller admitted to using the technology to write his recent editorial. This incident highlights a shifting cultural and ethical landscape regarding the use of AI in professional journalism.

Why it matters

The acceptance of AI-generated content in major publications challenges traditional notions of authorship and journalistic integrity.

✦Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

The Wall Street Journal is defending an op-ed written by a chatbot.

Illustration by Anna Ruch / The Atlantic. Source: Bloomberg / Getty. August 27, 2026, 6:12 PM ET Share Save There was a time—a more innocent age—when you could read an op-ed in a major newspaper and confidently say that a human had written it. Hold on to the memory of that for as long as you can.

This week, after the billionaire investor Stanley Druckenmiller published an editorial in The Wall Street Journal criticizing Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, his onetime protégé, readers began to notice some familiar tics of AI writing. According to Pangram, the AI-detection tool, the op-ed was 100 percent AI-generated.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
technologyculture
✦

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in