Is paying artists enough to convince them to embrace AI?
The AI startup Pippa is attempting to differentiate itself in the generative video market by implementing a compensation model for artists whose work informs their models. While the founders aim to move past the industry's history of unauthorized data scraping, they face skepticism regarding the underlying quality of their technology.
Why it matters
This highlights the ongoing tension between AI development and intellectual property rights, testing whether ethical compensation models can succeed in a competitive market.
Illustrators have spent years sounding the alarm about generative artificial intelligence startups training their models on artists’ work without permission. They’ve pointed out how the practice is tantamount to theft, and in response, many gen AI boosters have argued that it’s necessary for the technology’s evolution. This has led to contentious legal battles, but it’s also given rise to a new wave of AI startups like Pippa that market their services as being more ethical than the competition.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in