Innocent but 'guilty': Gachagua's absurd impeachment verdict pits lawyers against Judiciary
High Court judges in Kenya have upheld the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua while simultaneously awarding him Sh50 million for a violation of his right to a fair hearing. The ruling has sparked significant backlash from prominent legal experts and the Law Society of Kenya, who criticize the contradictory nature of the verdict.
Why it matters
The decision highlights deep tensions within the Kenyan judiciary and raises questions about constitutional precedent regarding the removal of high-ranking officials.
When High Court Judges Eric Ogola, Anthony Mrima and Freda Mugambi finished reading their 350-page judgment, affirming former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua's impeachment, but awarding him Sh50 million for violation of his right to a fair hearing opinion was dished fast and furious. Former Chief Justice Willy Mutunga, Law Society of Kenya (LSK) presidents Nelson Havi, Eric Theuri and Faith Odhiambo, senior lawyer Ahmednasir Abdullahi, lawyers Donald Kipkorir, Peter Wanyama, Waikwa Wanyoike, Evance Ndong, and Joshua Malidzo were among dozens who expressed dissatisfaction with how the three judges settled the case. Premium Article Get Full Access for Ksh299/Week. Bold Reporting Takes Time, Courage and Investment. Stand With Us. 🔥 Flash Sale ! Subscribe now and enjoy 50% off monthly and annual plans. Offer ends in…
The article reports on the controversy surrounding a court ruling by summarizing various legal perspectives without taking a definitive stance on the impeachment's validity.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in