Indonesia’s 2029 Test: The Institutions Between Elections
An analysis of Indonesia's political landscape suggests that electoral autocracy is eroding democratic institutions from within. Experts argue that while elections continue, the checks and balances that ensure accountability are being systematically weakened.
Why it matters
Understanding the erosion of democratic institutions is vital for assessing the future of governance and stability in Southeast Asia's largest economy.
Two weeks back I attended a public discussion on Indonesia’s economy and democracy, featuring Marcus Mietzner and Bivitri Susanti. As someone who has spent more than 25 years working across the Australia–Indonesia corridor, I found myself listening less as a political observer and more as someone who has spent a career navigating the practical consequences of institutional change.
<strong>The Question That Stayed With Me</strong>
The question put to Bivitri was simple: can electoral democracy still deliver meaningful correction in 2029?
As I understood her argument, electoral autocracy is not the absence of elections. It is the gradual weakening of the institutions that make elections meaningful — checks and balances, independent oversight, civic space, and public accountability. The vote remains; what erodes is everything around it.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in