India’s Parliament must not stage its Cadaver Synod
The author argues that the Indian Parliament should not proceed with an inquiry into a judge who has already resigned, comparing it to the historical 'Cadaver Synod'. The piece contends that such a process lacks legal purpose and serves only as performative theatre.
Why it matters
It raises significant constitutional and ethical questions regarding the limits of parliamentary oversight over former judicial officials.
In January 897 CE, Rome witnessed the strangest trial in the history of the Church. Pope Stephen VI ordered the corpse of his predecessor, Pope Formosus, dug up from its grave. Formosus had been dead for about nine months. His body was dressed in papal vestments and propped upon a throne in the Lateran basilica. A trembling deacon stood beside the corpse and answered questions on its behalf. The dead pope was charged with perjury and with violating canon law. He was, unsurprisingly, found guilty. His election was declared void. His acts were annulled. The three fingers of his right hand, the fingers of consecration, were hacked off. The body was then flung into the Tiber.
The article uses strong, critical language ('theatre', 'degrades the tribunal') to argue against a specific government action.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in