In this hour of need, contemplating a cut to Australia’s refugee intake is cruel populism
The author argues that Australia's potential reduction in refugee intake is a form of cruel populism that ignores the global displacement crisis. The piece highlights that Australia is currently resettling fewer refugees than it did in the early 1980s despite a much larger population and greater global need.
Why it matters
It highlights the tension between domestic political pressures regarding migration and international humanitarian obligations in an era of record-high global displacement.
A boy carries a girl on his back at a camp for Palestinian refugees in Gaza. ‘Nearly 130 million people are displaced around the world, more than 1% of humanity,’ Ben Doherty writes./Getty Images A boy carries a girl on his back at a camp for Palestinian refugees in Gaza. ‘Nearly 130 million people are displaced around the world, more than 1% of humanity,’ Ben Doherty writes./Getty Images Australian politics Analysis In this hour of need, contemplating a cut to Australia’s refugee intake is cruel populism Ben Doherty Confusion and politics aside, Australia can’t pretend to be removed from the world – and the millions of people in need of sanctuary
The article uses emotionally charged language like 'cruel populism' and 'cruelly parsimonious' to criticize government policy.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in