In the name of tradition
This commentary explores how religious and traditional rhetoric is used to justify patriarchal restrictions on women in India. It highlights recent controversies involving religious leaders and political figures regarding gender roles and historical texts.
Why it matters
It addresses the ongoing tension between traditional religious authority and modern gender equality in the Indian socio-political landscape.
(This article is part of the Gender Agenda newsletter. To get the newsletter in your inbox every Sunday, subscribe here .)
Patriarchy often speaks the language of religion and tradition. In Keralam last week, Kanthapuram A.P. Aboobacker Musliar, the president of the Samastha Kerala Jamiyyathul Ulama, issued a directive saying women should not share the stage with men or appear in public spaces with them. Seemingly inspired by Taliban-led Afghanistan’s treatment of women, the president of the influential association of traditional Sunni-Shafi’i Islamic scholars said if women did so, it could lead to “great destruction” (of what, though, he didn’t specify; if it is of patriarchy, I am all for it). The Hindu editorial pointed out , “It is a test of how far religious authority can intrude into the lives of women in a State that takes pride in its progressive social history.”
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in