In need of an overhaul: on the Election Commission of India’s press note

The Election Commission of India (ECI) is facing criticism over internal dissent and the controversial 'Special Intensive Revision' of electoral rolls. Critics argue the process has unfairly removed millions of voters and shifted the burden of enrollment onto citizens.
Why it matters
The integrity of the ECI is central to Indian democracy, and allegations of administrative bias or incompetence threaten public trust in the electoral process.
The Election Commission of India’s (ECI) press note on Saturday , following revelations that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had recorded 14 objections to decisions under Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, reads like damage control to manage perceptions. It concedes their complaints, but only administrative ones. Agenda will be circulated before meetings, and the minutes afterwards, while officers’ foreign trips will require the ECI’s approval. It also implicitly admits the flawed implementation of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) are to launch a “special drive” to enrol anyone “whose name has got left out”. But there is no remorse for an exercise that struck lakhs of genuine electors off the rolls in West Bengal and has marauded from State to State. Those deleted are simply asked to reapply as though they were new applicants. There is no answer to Mr.
Also covering this story
One other newsroom covered this event. We read that version too.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in