Illogical reasons: on The Hindu’s investigation of Delhi’s draft rolls

This opinion piece criticizes the Election Commission of India's (ECI) 'logical discrepancies' criteria used in electoral roll verification. The author argues that these criteria are arbitrary and disproportionately target minority communities for exclusion.
Why it matters
The integrity of electoral rolls is fundamental to democratic participation, and allegations of systemic bias in voter registration are significant political issues.
That the ECI’s SIR of electoral rolls has been flawed by design and tuned to exclude genuine electors rather than ensure their full enrolment is now well established. The Hindu ’s investigation of Delhi’s draft rolls and the names that the ECI flagged as “logical discrepancies” shows that the process is not only exclusionary but also insidious. The arbitrary nature of these “discrepancies”, especially those relating to family size, suggests that they were chosen to target communities with higher, though declining, fertility rates, for exclusion. Muslims make up 13.6% of Delhi’s draft rolls — in line with the 2011 Census — but accounted for 20.3% of those flagged for “logical discrepancies”. This number goes up to 30% for those flagged under the five reasons linked to family size.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in