ICC allows prior testimony of unidentified witness in Duterte case

The International Criminal Court has permitted prosecutors to use prior recorded testimony from an unidentified witness in the case against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte. The ruling allows the written statement to replace part of the witness's live examination, provided the witness consents and remains available for cross-examination.
Why it matters
This procedural decision is a significant development in the ongoing international legal scrutiny of Duterte's 'war on drugs' and alleged human rights abuses.
MANILA, Philippines - The International Criminal Court's Trial Chamber III has allowed prosecutors to use the prior recorded testimony of an unidentified witness, P-1100, in the case against former president Rodrigo Duterte, subject to the witness appearing in court and consenting to the use of the statement.In a decision dated Oct. 2, 2026, the three-judge chamber granted the prosecution's request under Rule 68(3) of the ICC Rules of Procedure and Evidence to introduce P-1100's written statement as evidence in place of part of his examination-in-chief.The chamber said using the prior testimony would not prejudice Duterte's rights because the defense would still have an opportunity to question P-1100 about his evidence, including his knowledge, credibility and the basis of his statements.Under Rule 68(3), prior recorded testimony may be admitted when the witness present before the chamber, does not object to its use, and the defense and judges are given an opportunity…
Also covering this story
One other newsroom covered this event. We read that version too.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in