I tested the viral Shark CryoGlow LED face mask 100 times - it’s not right for everyone
A beauty tech reviewer evaluates the Shark CryoGlow LED face mask after 100 uses, noting its effectiveness for acne and puffiness. While acknowledging the scientific basis for red-light therapy, the author explains why they have ultimately switched to a competing product.
Why it matters
As LED skincare devices gain popularity through social media, consumers need evidence-based reviews to navigate the high cost and varying quality of beauty tech products.
Face time: ‘If my younger self got wind I was strapping on a glowing mask every day, she would die laughing.’ Face time: ‘If my younger self got wind I was strapping on a glowing mask every day, she would die laughing.’ Guardian journalism is independent. We earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more .
Brilliant for managing breakouts and refreshing puffy eyes, but after months of treatments, is Shark’s light therapy device the one our writer would buy now?
Sarah Matthews Sun 23 Aug 2026 08.00 EDT Share Prefer the Guardian on Google O f all the LED masks I’ve tested, the Shark CryoGlow feels like the most heavily marketed. Touted as a one-stop shop for anti-ageing, blemish-busting and undereye cooling, it’s trickled its way into countless influencer morning routines and post-work wind-downs, slowly but surely filling up my social media timeline.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in