How Trump’s funding cuts slowed the CDC’s cyclosporiasis response
A former CDC lab head claims that budget cuts and hiring freezes under the Trump administration significantly hampered the agency's ability to respond to a cyclospora outbreak. While the administration defended the cuts as necessary for fiscal efficiency, experts argue that the loss of specialized staff and shared resources created a dangerous gap in public health response.
Why it matters
It illustrates the real-world impact of administrative policy changes on public health infrastructure and disease outbreak management.
As head of the federal lab responsible for identifying parasitic outbreaks throughout the nation, Dr. Joel Barratt watched with alarm as Trump administration cuts and hiring freezes last year slowly depleted his staff. By the time his 11-person team was reduced to three in September, Barratt said he had enough and resigned. But before leaving, he said, he sent emails to higher-ups at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about the risks of losing staff and how it could hurt the response to future outbreaks. And now, those warnings have become reality, with the employees working to rein in a growing cyclospora outbreak in the Midwest, forced to do more with less. “The response is being hampered by the loss of specialized staff and the loss of hands-on-deck needed to identify the source of the outbreaks,” he said.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in