Home confinement under royal pardon differs from house arrest, has own SOPs
Malaysian Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail clarified that home confinement under a royal pardon is distinct from statutory house arrest and operates under specific, case-by-case standard operating procedures. This follows the conditional pardon granted to former Prime Minister Najib Razak, who remains in prison pending the payment of a fine.
Why it matters
The distinction between royal clemency and legal house arrest is a point of significant constitutional and political debate in Malaysia regarding the treatment of high-profile convicts.
BURSA SGX Home Parliament Make The Edge Malaysia your preferred source on Google KUALA LUMPUR (Oct 7): Home confinement granted under a royal conditional pardon cannot be equated with a statutory house arrest order as it operates under its own set of rules, according to Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail.
Addressing questions about monitoring protocols and visitation limits, Saifuddin explained in a written parliamentary reply on Tuesday that while general house arrest legislation remains under review, terms for conditional home confinement would be detailed through the relevant standard operating procedures.
This is because home confinement stems from the King's prerogative of clemency under the Federal Constitution, so its implementation is subject to the terms set by the pardoning authority.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in