Holes (1996-2025)
This article explores the ontological and epistemological status of 'holes' as objects of study. It examines whether holes are real entities or merely conceptual representations used in human cognition.
Why it matters
It provides a philosophical perspective on how humans categorize and perceive the physical world, which has implications for cognitive science and AI ontology.
Holes are an interesting case study for ontologists and epistemologists. On the one hand, naive descriptions of the world treat holes as objects of reference and quantification, on a par with ordinary material objects ('This hole has no lid'; 'That cheese has seven holes'). Moreover, we often appeal to holes to account for causal interactions ('The hole in the roof caused a leak'), or to explain the occurrence of certain events ('The water spilled because the bucket has a hole'). All this provides initial evidence for treating holes as real entities. On the other hand, holes appear to be much more elusive than ordinary objects, ontologically as well as epistemologically; after all, they are a paradigm example of nothingness. So one may wonder whether such evidence is to be taken seriously. Should we instead think that all talk about holes is a misleading fa on de parler ?
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in