Hiding the scissors: On the Central Board of Film Certification

The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) in India is accused of exercising excessive, opaque control over cinematic content to align with the ruling government's ideology. The article highlights the board's failure to follow transparency laws and its role in suppressing political dissent in film.
Why it matters
The erosion of artistic freedom and the lack of transparency in government censorship boards raise significant concerns regarding democratic values and cultural expression.
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) wields significant cultural influence by deciding which films can be screened in Indian cinemas. Its decisions on what to excise from Indian films are followed nearly completely even by streaming services, despite not being required to show the censor’s version of a filmmaker’s artistic vision. The patterns that producers interpret from the CBFC’s decisions determine which stories are even made. There is a reason why few political films that espouse the cause of secularism (or the ills of communalism) are seen in cinemas today. There is also a reason why few would dare to make a film such as Satluj, considering what it went through at the censors’ hands, and the fate it was met with when an online release was briefly achieved.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in