Article may be outdated

This article is 81 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Wired·4 min read·medium

He Blew the Whistle on DOGE. Then His Brakes Were Cut

V
Vittoria Elliott
He Blew the Whistle on DOGE. Then His Brakes Were Cut
AI Summary

Dan Berulis, an NLRB whistleblower, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Elon Musk after alleging that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) compromised agency data. Berulis claims he was targeted for his disclosures, including an incident where his car's brakes were allegedly tampered with.

Why it matters

The case highlights intense tensions between government oversight, private sector influence in public administration, and whistleblower protections.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Photograph: WLADIMIR BULGAR/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY/Getty Images Comment Loader Save Story Save this story Comment Loader Save Story Save this story On April 14, 2025, Dan Berulis, an IT staffer at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), filed a Congressional whistleblower complaint with an extraordinary and urgent claim: The so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had seemingly compromised the agency’s data and appeared to be exfiltrating it out of the NLRB entirely. Additionally, Berulis claimed that mere minutes after DOGE members had accessed the agency’s data, there appeared to be login attempts from an IP address in Russia.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicsbusinesssocial justice
Political Bias
Lean Left
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 70%

The framing focuses heavily on the whistleblower's narrative and the controversial nature of the DOGE initiative.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in