HC dismisses plea to prevent unauthorised collection of amounts in DPCs as similar petition filed earlier
The Madras High Court dismissed a public interest litigation seeking to prevent unauthorized collection of money at direct purchase centers for paddy. The court ruled that the petition was repetitive and lacked specific details, mirroring a previously dismissed case.
Why it matters
This reflects judicial efforts to prevent the misuse of the Public Interest Litigation process for vague or repetitive grievances.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a petition that sought a direction to the authorities to prevent unauthorised collection of amounts in direct purchase centres (DPCs).
The petitioner N. Thangachamy sought a direction to authorities to prevent unauthorised collection of amounts in DPCs and interference by unauthorised agents and middlemen.
He sought a direction to the Centre and the State to constitute an independent expert committee to ascertain the actual comprehensive cost of paddy cultivation in Tamil Nadu and ensure fixation of the Minimum Support Price in line with the recommendations of the National Commission on Farmers.
A Division Bench of Justices C.V. Karthikeyan and R. Sakthivel took into account that the same petitioner had filed a similar petition earlier.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in