GPT-5.6, Grok 4.5, Claude, and Muse Spark build the same 4 apps
A comparative benchmark test evaluates twelve AI models, including new iterations of GPT, Grok, Claude, and Muse Spark, across four coding tasks. The study measures performance, cost, and latency in building functional applications like a raycaster and a Rubik's cube.
Why it matters
These benchmarks provide critical data for developers and enterprises trying to determine which LLM offers the best balance of capability and efficiency for specific coding tasks.
All posts comparison coding benchmarks GPT-5.6, Grok 4.5, Claude, and Muse Spark build the same 4 apps GPT-5.6's new Sol, Terra, and Luna tiers go head-to-head with Grok 4.5, Claude, Meta's Muse Spark, and the open-weights crew on a raycaster, a Rubik's cube, a calculator, and Game of Life. Here's every build, with cost and latency.
The article presents empirical benchmark results without favoring a specific model.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in