For AI leaders Doom is a form of hype
A media scholar critiques the trend of AI industry leaders making apocalyptic predictions about the technology's future. The author argues that these 'doomer' narratives are strategically used to influence regulation and public perception while distracting from immediate, tangible harms.
Why it matters
This perspective challenges the dominant narrative surrounding AI safety, suggesting that existential risk rhetoric may be a calculated move by tech giants to consolidate power.
I am so fed up with doomy statements from the AI leaders. I may have lost my patience with it. The latest instance is the BBC’s report that Evan Hubinger, who leads alignment science at Anthropic, believes there is a “greater than 10% chance” that AI could “kill all humans” within the next decade. The occasion was the resignation of Jacob Coxon, a 27-year-old pretraining researcher who had worked at both OpenAI and Anthropic, and who wrote: “Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.”[^3]
In what follows, you will find an in-depth report curated by Perplexity.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in