Father-in-law not liable under domestic violence law for not controlling son: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court ruled that a father-in-law cannot be held legally liable under the Domestic Violence Act for failing to control the actions of his adult son. The court clarified that a domestic relationship alone does not establish liability for the misconduct of other family members.
Why it matters
This legal precedent clarifies the scope of the Domestic Violence Act in India, limiting the vicarious liability of in-laws in matrimonial disputes.
The Delhi High Court has held that a father-in-law cannot be held responsible under the Domestic Violence Act merely for failing to intervene in the conduct of his adult son.
Justice Madhu Jain made the observation while dismissing a woman’s challenge to a lower court order that had declined to proceed against her father-in-law over allegations of domestic violence.
The woman had alleged that her father-in-law failed to take action against her estranged husband over his alleged involvement with another woman.
Examining the scope of Section 3 of the Domestic Violence Act, the High Court noted that the provision covers conduct causing or threatening physical or mental harm, including verbal, emotional and economic abuse. However, the Court stressed that the mere existence of a domestic relationship does not, by itself, attract the provisions of the Act.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in