Far from over: on the U.S.-Iran conflict

The U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement has collapsed following military strikes in the Strait of Hormuz and retaliatory attacks on American bases. Tensions remain high due to unresolved issues regarding nuclear programs, frozen funds, and control over strategic maritime shipping routes.
Why it matters
The escalation threatens global energy security and risks a broader regional conflict in the Middle East.
It took only 20 days for the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU), which promised to extend the ceasefire by 60 days and launch talks about outstanding issues, including Iran’s nuclear programme, to start unravelling. On Tuesday night, the U.S. carried out sweeping air strikes in Iran after three tankers were attacked in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran struck American bases in Kuwait and Bahrain after which Mr. Trump declared that the ceasefire was over. While he is known for making exaggerated claims, the current crisis poses the biggest challenge to the peace process since the June 17 MoU. The crisis did not emerge overnight. From the outset, the agreement had three major sticking points — Israel’s war in Lebanon; Iran’s access to its frozen funds and the status of the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran sees Israel’s refusal to withdraw from southern Lebanon, along with Washington’s push for a parallel trilateral framework involving the U.S., Lebanon and Israel, as violations of the spirit of the MoU. And, despite talks, Iran has yet to get access to its frozen funds. Finally, Iran appears determined to assert control over the Strait. It has opened a “safe passage route” along its coast, while the U.S. is backing an alternative route along Oman’s coast.
The article provides a balanced overview of the conflicting strategic interests of both the U.S. and Iran.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in