Emitters' claims that court case would shut them down are 'hyperbolic'
A New Zealand parliamentary committee is debating a bill that would protect major greenhouse gas emitters from being sued for climate change damages. Critics and defendants are clashing over whether the legal action against these companies is a legitimate pursuit of accountability or an economic threat.
Why it matters
The outcome of this legislation could set a significant precedent for how climate change litigation is handled in relation to existing environmental policy.
Claims that a court case against major greenhouse gas emitters would put companies out of business are "frankly hyperbolic", a select committee has heard.
The article presents arguments from both the government/defendants and the climate activist, maintaining a balanced reporting style.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in