EFF, DA blast Didiza’s decision not to oppose Ramaphosa’s impeachment interdict
The EFF and DA have criticized National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza for her decision not to oppose President Cyril Ramaphosa's court interdict against impeachment proceedings, despite legal advice recommending opposition. The EFF alleges Didiza's choice was politically motivated, serving the ANC and ignoring her constitutional duty to defend parliament's authority.
Why it matters
This decision impacts the accountability of the President and the independence of the legislative branch in South Africa, potentially setting a precedent for how high-ranking officials can avoid parliamentary oversight.
The EFF has blasted National Assembly speaker Thoko Didiza for opting not to challenge President Cyril Ramaphosa’s court bid to stop parliament’s impeachment proceedings despite legal advice.
Reports on the statements and criticisms from opposition parties regarding a political decision, presenting their arguments directly.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in