Article may be outdated

This article is 39 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Inquirer.net·3 min read·hard

Duterte remarks vs Marcos ‘not threats in the first place’

K
Keith Clores
Duterte remarks vs Marcos ‘not threats in the first place’
AI Summary

The defense team for Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte argues that her remarks about contracting individuals to kill the President and other officials were not actual threats. The prosecution maintains that the statements constitute grave threats regardless of whether the targets felt personally endangered.

Why it matters

This legal battle tests the boundaries of political speech and the definition of 'grave threats' within the Philippine judicial system.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

MANILA, Philippines - Vice President Sara Duterte's defense team asserted on Tuesday that the remarks she made on contracting an individual to take down President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., first lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez are "not threats in the first place."

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politics
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 85%

The article presents both the defense's argument and the prosecution's legal citations neutrally.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in