DRC has taken Rwanda to the world court over genocide again. A law scholar explains what’s different this time
The Democratic Republic of Congo has filed a new lawsuit against Rwanda at the International Court of Justice, alleging genocide and atrocity crimes. Previous attempts to hold Rwanda accountable failed due to jurisdictional issues, but legal scholars are analyzing the potential for a different outcome this time.
Why it matters
This case represents a significant effort to address long-standing regional conflict and human rights abuses in Central Africa through international legal frameworks.
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) filed a lawsuit against Rwanda at the International Court of Justice at the end of June 2026. The 60-page complaint alleges acts of genocide and other atrocity crimes by Rwandan forces and their intermediaries dating from 1996 to the present day.
The DRC has twice before brought similar cases against Rwanda at this court. Both failed on questions of jurisdiction. So, what explains yet another case against Rwanda? Kerstin Bree Carlson, a scholar of international justice and author of a book on international law in Africa , examines this history and what's behind the DRC's confidence in its latest push. What did the DRC's previous cases involve?
The DRC has twice tried to bring Rwanda before the International Court of Justice in relation to violence carried out or backed by Rwanda on its soil. It was unsuccessful both times.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in